Paul Graham:

One advantage of Y Combinator's early, broad focus is that we see trends before most other people. And one of the most conspicuous trends in the last batch was the large number of hardware startups. Out of 84 companies, 7 were making hardware. On the whole they've done better than the companies that weren't.

They've faced resistance from investors of course. Investors have a deep-seated bias against hardware. But investors' opinions are a trailing indicator. The best founders are better at seeing the future than the best investors, because the best founders are making it.

From personal experience, hardware startups are definitely undergoing a well-deserved renaissance.

Investors are, indeed, somewhat apprehensive. Most tend to default to recommendations of Kickstart-ing a project, rather than pursuing venture capital. But, steadily over the past few months, there's been a marked transition in the typical investor's mindset.

Cautious intrigue has replaced caustic uncertainty and, as a result, there are some truly phenomenal hardware projects being undertaken all over the world. As we've seen in the software industry, startups — and the disruption they encourage — have a keen propensity for upsetting established norms and creating phenomenal new levels of competition.

For the hardware industry — a space so often characterized by monopolizing giants — I couldn't be happier that the tide is turning.

Posted
AuthorMatt Alexander

Ben Brooks:

Simply put: I hate the business model of this blog, well actually I hated the business model of this blog.

The monetization of Internet content is easily one of the most compelling, rich, and fascinating narrative threads occurring within the online writing community today. On a daily basis, discussions seem to sporadically ignite concerning the nature of advertising, sponsorships, and membership drives.

Yet, despite the excessive volume of discussion, few people dare to embark upon a measurably new path. Although reticence is certainly comprehendible with regard to career stability, the publishing sphere is ripe for disruption, and those who dare to experiment are likely to be well-rewarded.

Today, Ben Brooks has implemented a pseudo-paywall system for his site, The Brooks Review. Admittedly, when I heard the term “paywall,” my immediate reaction was of sincere pessimism. Experiences with The New York Times, The London Times, and The Wall Street Journal have each left me with rather bitter sentiments for paywall implementations.

And yet, Ben has embarked upon this path intelligently. Rather than simply following the industry standard, Ben evidently took a long, hard look at the pre-existing paywall landscape, and has sought to improve the situation. Offering a number of novel intricacies to the equation, Ben has contributed something measurably new to the discussion. Regardless of any degree of success, I believe the contribution is of the utmost importance, and Ben has certainly made one today.

Thus, despite any divergence of opinion between myself and Ben in matters of technology and business, I cannot help but tip my hat toward his bold decision today. Independent writers are increasingly shaping the landscape for intelligent discourse, and monetization — for better or worse — is an integral element of such an equation. Rather than simply perpetuating the status quo, Ben has embarked upon something unique, and that’s certainly deserving of praise.

Further information is available from The Brooks Review Membership Page.

Posted
AuthorMatt Alexander

Louis C.K.

Following the successful independent distribution of his latest stand-up special late last year, Louis C.K.’s latest experiment appears to have paid off. Announced on Twitter, Mr. C.K. wrote:

Within an extraordinarily small timeframe, Louis C.K. has once again offered a profound statement regarding the nature of the media industry. Following indictments of both media and ticket distribution, Mr. C.K. has thereby decisively proven that independent distribution is thoroughly within the bounds of financial feasibility, mass-market accessibility, and consumer affability.

Here’s hoping Mr. C.K.’s innovative maneuverings further catalyze media attitudes in a meaningful way moving forward.

P.S., my apologies for the repeated title image, but it’s simply too perfect to avoid re-using.

Posted
AuthorMatt Alexander

Louis C.K.

Late last year, Louis C.K. caused quite a stir when he released his latest stand-up special via his personal website without implementing any semblance of digital rights management (DRM) protection. Despite what many distributors might have you believe about such an unprotected maneuver, Mr. C.K. enjoyed a great deal of success and, indeed, prompted a tidal shift in the distribution of comedic specials.

Furthering the experiment, Louis C.K. has announced the exclusive availability of his upcoming tour tickets via his personal website. Cutting out deplorable organizations such as TicketMaster, Louis C.K.’s tickets are available for a simple $45 price. No complication, no trouble, and utterly affable for the prospective consumer.

In a blog post discussing the matter, Louis C.K. writes:

By selling the tickets exclusively on my site, I’ve cut the ticket charges way down and absorbed them into the ticket price. To buy a ticket, you join NOTHING. Just use your credit card and buy the damn thing. opt in to the email list if you want, and you’ll only get emails from me.

Also, you’ll see that if you try to sell the ticket anywhere for anything above the original price, we have the right to cancel your ticket (and refund your money). this is something I intend to enforce. There are some other rules you may find annoying but they are meant to prevent someone who has no intention of seeing the show from buying the ticket and just flipping it for twice the price from a thousand miles away.

Honestly, I couldn’t be more impressed by Mr. C.K.’s experiments in this field. Considering his comedy provides for his livelihood, Mr. C.K.’s apparent willingness to throw caution to the wind, anger ticket retailers, anger media distributors, and work toward his own vision of equality in the marketplace is not only brave, but supremely endearing.

Treating the consumer with respect — particularly for a personality-driven industry — will prove invaluable for Mr. C.K.’s prospective successes. Placing himself in the proverbial open, allowing discourse between himself and his fans, and re-defining the malevolence of the traditional consumer experience are certainly not simple tasks to contend with. But, in doing so, Louis C.K. has established a precedent in the comedy industry — something that we can only hope will permeate across the media industry in its entirety in relatively short order.

I fully intend to be at the Dallas, Texas show on October 20.

Posted
AuthorMatt Alexander

John Lilly:

I picked up a phrase some time ago that I think applies: “The next big thing is always beneath contempt.” Implication being that it is, of course, until it isn’t. Until it’s too big to ignore. This has happened over and over again in our society. In the middle ages, people assumed that no serious discussion could happen in anything but Latin — the so-called “vulgar” languages had no merit. And writers assumed that nothing interesting or lasting would come from this new medium of television. And, I think, people assume right now that nothing important will be created from a 10” touch screen without a keyboard (let alone a tiny 3.5” screen).

But I think that we already know that that’s a mistaken view of history, and of the future. That humans always find a way to create, and to make. Phones and tablets are right in the midst of becoming devices of incredible creation, and they’re going to let us create things on the go, in real time, that we never imagined.

One of the most baffling aspects of human nature is the tendency to question the perpetual tide of innovative change.

Basing perspectives within some sort of conservative and fearful construct, individuals frequently and fearfully disregard impending change. Rather than dialectically seeking to improve experiences, people all-too-frequently align themselves with the familiar, and actively look to prevent losing this environment.

In a technological sense, with each major operating system version, hardware iteration, and software update, the Internet is veritably flooded with people quickly scrambling to duplicate outdated functionality, to rollback to their prior environment, or expressing vehement outrage over the compulsory UI changes instituted by their favorite web application.

Without due cause, people are all-too-keen to shortsightedly judge the significance of the ebb and flow of innovation. Sadly, without taking part in this constructive conversation, true improvement cannot be attained. Excluding oneself from the changing environment is ultimately akin to abstaining from voting, or from contributing your voice in an important discussion.

Innovation and change occur irrespective of pre-existing circumstance and context. Judging a device, service, or piece of technology based solely upon such pre-existing circumstances renders opinions and attitudes utterly out-of-step with the remainder of the world.

Whilst Mr. Lilly’s argument is aimed at the misguided notion that touch-centric mobile computing is inherently subordinate to traditional desktops with hardware keyboards, his perspective holds true for virtually any aspect of the changing world, and I sincerely applaud him for writing about it in such a fashion.

Posted
AuthorMatt Alexander

According to The Wall Street Journal, Hulu is actively developing two new shows for broadcast on its streaming platform.

Considering Netflix's increasing investment in original programming, it's encouraging to see Hulu recognizing the growing trends in the market. 

Interestingly, Hulu is owned by Walt Disney Co. and News Corp (amongst others) -- two companies notorious for their problems with streaming content. Although the likelihood of Hulu's sale has been in doubt, adopting such a progressive strategy is indicative of a potentially resurfacing disagreement between Hulu and its owners, and lends credibility to rumors of Hulu being put back on the market in 2012.

Following steep revenue gains and subscriber uptake, Hulu is reiterating its relevance in an increasingly competitive market. The media industry is irrefutably changing, and Hulu's recognition and active address of this environment gives me heaps of confidence for the platform's competitive future.

Posted
AuthorMatt Alexander

Jake Coyle for the Associated Press:

Tom Hanks' long gestating Web series is coming to Yahoo.

"Electric City," an animated futuristic series Hanks has been developing for years, will premiere on Yahoo this spring. The series includes 20 episodes, each three- or four-minutes long.

'Electric City' is certainly not on the same level as Netflix's forthcoming forays into original content, but Tom Hanks' effort will undoubtedly lend high profile credence to the prospect of an evolving media marketplace.

Incidentally, if Yahoo can identify and act upon changing media trends, why can't large scale cable companies and media distributors?

(Via Dan Benjamin)

Posted
AuthorMatt Alexander

M.G. Siegler:

If you could remove your lips from the cable company teet for a minute, you’d find hundreds of thousands — and likely millions — of customers happy to pay a premium for access to HBO Go without the cable requirement right now. That number is only going to grow. And fast.

Content is king, and you have the best content. If you do go cable-optional, a few of the cable companies may try to boycott you. But the ensuing customer relations shitstorm will only prove your value and will hasten the arrival of the post-cable world. You can lead this revolution.

Couldn't agree more.

Posted
AuthorMatt Alexander